 |
|
| |
|
|
• |
Realised in
46 models worldwide |
• |
Can be executed not
only with traditional or double
spiral mixers or fork mixers, but
also with twin arm or planetary
mixers for particular productions. |
• |
The most complete
and flexible existing automation
with the ability to remove manual
input completely. The robot can
take over all operations normally
carried out by production line
staff, moving bowls from one station
to another according to production
requirements and to working cycles
previously programmed. |
• |
The system can be
easily adapted to the customer's
needs, with different type of mixers
(fork, twin arms or spiral) and
elevators (ER2, ER1, ERT) and with
several dosing and leavening stations.
It is also possible to feed several
production lines with different
recipes in the same time. |
• |
This type of plant
is controlled by a PLC for an easy
control of all essential elements
such as mixing time, leavening
time, etc.. Sancassiano have designed
many solutions to improve the use,
hygiene requirements and performance
of this plant that nowadays represents
the most advanced technology in
its field. |
• |
No platforms, railways
or chains in the working area of
the moving unit to prevent perfect
sanitation. |
• |
The moving unit runs
on aerial railways leaving the
floor below completely free for
cleaning, complying with the strictest
international laws (HACCP, USDA,
FDA,…) |
• |
Exceptional mechanical
sturdiness, thanks to innovative
mechanical solutions (friction
wheels, self-lubricating components,
lubrication-free gearboxes etc.)
reduces maintenance to less than
1 hour per week. |
|
| |
|
|
| A noteworthy
example of a Sancassiano Robot System
is in Germany where a major firm in
the bakery industry produces 1700 kg
dough per hour for hamburger buns with
two SE 250 Removable Bowl Spiral Mixers
into which the necessary ingredients
are fed along with two proving stations.
The great flexibility of this automatic
plant involves three different processes:
direct processing, proving before discharging
and proving between the two kneading
phases. |
|
|
|